Saturday 11 April 2015

DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES!!

On the 7th of April 20 men were reported to have been shot dead by a police posse in an encounter in the Seshachalam forests near Tirupati in Andhra Pradesh. These men were allegedly involved in cutting down precious red sander (red sandal) trees which grow well in the area. Felling of red sanders is a banned operation in Andhra as the state government is going the extra mile to protect this precious species. Interestingly, all the 20 who died were from Tamilnadu. The police version is that they, along with over a hundred others were part of the flourishing red sanders smuggling network. When a team from the newly-formed anti-smuggling task force, who were searching the forest for smugglers, accosted them, the wood cutters are reported to have pelted stones at the police party. Fearing for their lives, the policemen retaliated with gun fire, killing 20 of the so-called smugglers. The rest of the wood cutters, numbering over a 100, escaped. Vanished without a trace!

History has shown that policemen make poor scriptwriters. And the police version of the course of events is full of holes. The initial autopsy reports indicate that most of those who died had been shot from close range – an unlikely eventuality if the wood cutters were pelting stones at the police party from a distance. Most of the shots had gone through the victims’ vital organs, killing them immediately, indicating a high degree of precision marksmanship. Which means that the shooters must have been of a calibre superior to Abhinav Bhindra, Olympic gold medallist in shooting, considering that they were firing at moving targets, while facing a fusillade of pelted stones in the dim light of a thick forest!

The next interesting fact is that while shots were fired at over a 100 marauding wood cutters, 20 ended up stone cold dead, while not even one was caught alive or wounded.

The bodies of the dead were left for display before the media for several hours on a warm summer day before being sent for autopsy. Those who conducted the post mortem have recorded that the bodies were received by them in an advanced stage of decomposition making the examination very difficult.

One Sekhar of Tiruvannamalai District has stirred the hornets nest by revealing that he, along with 7 others had been hired for a wood-cutting assignment in Andhra only the previous day. While they were travelling to their destination by bus, a police party had stopped the vehicle at a check post. Sekhar’s associates had all been picked up by the police and whisked away. Since Sekhar was sitting next to a woman on the bus, he had been mistaken for a family man and not taken away. According to Sekhar, all his seven associates ended up as dead bodies in the “encounter” the following day. If Sekhar’s version is found to be true, the  “encounter” would turn out to be cold-blooded mass murder.

Quite obviously the Andhra police, and the state Government, have a lot of explaining to do in the forthcoming days and weeks, especially considering that the courts of laws and human rights institutions have suo moto started asking uncomfortable questions in the full view of an agitated public and the media.


The incident has also come as Manna from heaven for some of Tamilnadu’s political orphans, who have been robbed of all their steam after the annihilation of the LTTE in Sri Lanka, followed by a change of government in the Island republic. The Vaikos and the Seemans, who had been starved for months for a juicy issue to bite into, have jumped into the fray like wolves baying for justice. For these worthies, the killing of the 20 wood cutters is not a human rights issue but an “insane attack against the Tamil people”!     
    
The Chandrababu Naidu government in Andhra Pradesh has taken the fizz out of the politically sponsored agitations in Tamilnadu by strategically announcing the release of water from the River Krishna at Kandaleru to meet the drinking water needs of Chennai – a subtle reminder that if the agitations escalate to embarrassing levels, the Krishna canal could suddenly develop a fresh series of breaches which would render Chennai waterless this summer!

Further, one of the Andhra Pradesh ministers has neutralised the Tamilnadu government by comparing the massacre to the slaughter of the notorious sandalwood smuggler Veerappan and his associates by the Tamilnadu special task force in 2004, when the AIADMK dispensation under Jayalalithaa was in power.

The political charades will be played out. So will the trial by the media. Several fact-finding missions will look into the incident. Several commissions of inquiry will be set up. Already a magisterial inquiry has commenced. There is a demand for an inquiry by a sitting High Court judge. Some opportunists, wishing to play the linguistic card have demanded an inquiry by a judge from a High Court other than Andhra or Tamilnadu. There is a demand for a CBI investigation. The Supreme Court is being moved by some groups. The state and National Human Rights Commissions are all seized of the matter and demanding explanations...


And this brings us to the key issues that have to be looked at, but will most certainly be conveniently ignored :


  •      Why the hullabaloo over Red Sanders?

Red Sanders is a hard wood with medicinal properties, the paste of which was traditionally used in Ayurveda to treat skin infections and pimples. The wood was also used to carve little human and animal figurines which was used a playthings by the generations past. Of late, however, the wood of the red sanders tree is being smuggled out of India, mainly to China, where it is reportedly being used as an absorbent of nuclear radiation in nuclear plants. One red sanders tree, which when shorn of the branches could weigh about 100 kilograms, is reported to fetch in the region of Rs 25 lakhs in the smugglers’ market. And it is this lucrative market that the smugglers network is trying to cater to.


  •       Why were all those who were shot dead only Tamils?

Most of the workers hired to cut the red sanders trees in Andhra are tribals from Tamilnadu, particularly from the Javadhu Hills area of Tiruvannamalai district. This region is particularly arid and agricultural activities come to a halt with the advent of summer. The tribals are lured with wages of Rs 1000 per day during which they not only fell a tree each, but also carry it to a loading site several kilometres away. Being tribals who have spent all their lives in forest terrain, they accomplish this task with ease. They also are adept at identifying the precious red sanders trees.

  • Why did the 20 woodcutters have to be so mercilessly massacred?

The incidents of red sanders smuggling has been increasing by the day and the police force of Andhra Pradesh has been under tremendous pressure from the judiciary and the media to do something about it. The Andhra Pradesh government had earlier made the felling of red sanders illegal and had also constituted a special task force to control the smuggling activities. This force had to do something to show the world that they are doing their work. And what better way than to shoot down a few tribals from a different state and blame them for all the smuggling activities that was going on?


But obviously, the one who wrote the script and directed the farce was not an experienced hand. The script was flawed. The writer had not taken the huge public outcry and the interference of the human rights activists and the judiciary into account. As far as the police were concerned, the real smugglers’ names had to be protected. What better way than to shoot dead a few wood cutters, blame them for all the smuggling activity that has been taking place for years in the area? After all, they felt, DEAD MEN TELL NO TALES.

The whole incident reminds me of words that were scribbled on the walls of Dartmoor Prison in London : “I walk through the prison; and what do you think I see? A host of dumb-bells doing time, while all the crooks go free!!

The incident also reminds me of a blog penned by my Guru in Journalism, Pritish Nandy, which I am appending below :

http://www.rediff.com/news/2000/dec/09nandy.htm


In short, what I am trying to say is that after the initial brouhaha dies down, this reprehensible incident will also be forgotten and consigned to the annals of history. The real red sanders mafia will continue to flourish like the granite mafia, the sand mafia, the coal mafia, the rare-earth mafia and so many other mafias that call the shots in various parts of India. It will fund political parties, get peoples’ representatives elected, launch newspapers and TV channels and lecture to the world about lofty issues like human rights violation and corruption. And periodically the Seshachalam encounter will be revisited, whenever there is a public clamour about the state’s ineptitude to tackle crime.


Thursday 2 April 2015

A TINY STEP WITH A HUGE FOOTPRINT

A couple of months ago, in a post titled THE ECONOMIC RAPE OF INDIA -- THE BROTHERS MARAN (reproduced below for easy reference), I had said that the wheels of justice were moving slowly by inexorably towards the Maran Brothers -- Kalanidhi and Dayanidhi for their role in the Great Telecom Robbery that shook the conscience of a somnolent Indian state and people. 

Yesterday, I received a Press Release from the Directorate of Enforcement, Government of India, which is also reproduced below. If its contents are implemented with immediate effect, even as I write this post, the Maran Brothers would be poorer by Rs 742.58 Crore rupees. Not that it would make much of a difference to them. They have enough and more stashed away in the coffers of several countries. But the move by the Enforcement Directorate is still enough to demonstrate to the people of this nation that all is not lost in India; that the rule of law exists; that justice still prevails; and that we can still hold hope for a better, corruption-free tomorrow...

A tiny step, no doubt. But one that will leave a huge imprint on the public mind.

 
PRESS RELEASE
Directorate of Enforcement in Aircel – Maxis Scam Case has issued Order under (Prevention of Money Laundering Act) PMLA for the attachment of the assets held by Shri Dayanidhi Maran, Shri Kalanithi Maran and Smt Kaveri Kalanithi. This attachment is issued by the Directorate in respect of the offence of money laundering relating to the illegal gratification amounting to Rs 742.58 crores received by Shri Dayanidhi Maran. The offence of money laundering under Section 3 of PMLA is being investigated in respect of the offences punishable under section 120-B of IPC read with section 7, 12 and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of PC Act, which are scheduled offences under PMLA and is punishable under Section 4 of the Act.

In this case, CBI has filed charge sheet against the Maran brothers and their companies including the foreign companies and individuals in whch these persons are charges for the offences punishable under section 120-B of IPC read with section 7, 12 and section 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) of PC Act. So the attachment of the illegal gratification by Shri Dayanidhi Maran has been done thereafter, as per provisions of PMLA.

The investigation under PMLA being carried out by the Headquarter Investigation Unit (HIU) in the Head Office of the Directorate has revealed that illegal gratification of Rs 742.58 crores was paid by the companies based in Mauritius for Shri Dayanidhi Maran, in the two companies namely M/s Sun Direct TV Pvt Ltd (SDTPL) and M/s South Asia FM Ltd (SAFL). These two companies are owned and controlled by Shri Kalanithi Maran, brother of Shri Dayanidhi Maran. The money has been utilized by the companies in their business or investments.
 
The investigation under PMLA has further revealed that promoters of the SDTPL are Shri Kalanithi Maran and Smt Kaveri Kalanithi. These two persons are holding 80% shares of SDTPL. The shareholders of SAFL are M/s Sun TV Network Limited (60%) and 20% each are M/s A H Multisoft Pvt Ltd and M/s South Asia Multimedia Technologies Ltd, Mauritius. Shri Kalanithi Maran is holding 75% share of M/s Sun TV Network Limited. Shri Kalanithi Maran and Smt Kaveri Kalanithi are having 90% and 10% shareholding respectively in a company M/s Kal Comm Pvt Ltd.

The following Properties are attached under Section 5(1) of PMLA –
1. Fixed deposits held by Mr Dayanidhi Maran and others - Rs 7.47 Crores.
2. Fixed deposits held by SDTPL - Rs 31.34 Crores.
3. Fixed deposits held by SAFL - Rs 6.19 Crores
4. Mutual Funds held by SAFL - Rs15.14 Crores.
5. Fixed Deposit held by Mr Kalanithi Maran - Rs 100 Crores.
6. Mutual Funds held by Ms Kalanithi Maran - Rs 2.78 Crores.
7. Fixed Deposit held by Ms Kaveri Kalanithi - Rs 1.30 Crores.
8. Mutual Funds held by Ms Kaveri Kalanithi - Rs 1.78 Crores.
9. Land and Building owned by M/s Kal Comm Private Limited - Rs 171.55 Crores.
10. Free Hold Land and Building owned by M/s Sun Network TV Pvt. Ltd - Rs 266 Crores.
11. Shares of SDTPL held by Shri Kalanithi Maran – Rs 139 Crores.


THE ECONOMIC RAPE OF INDIA 


THE BROTHERS MARAN

Dayanidhi Maran’s million-dollar smile is all set to be wiped out. The noose is slowly tightening round his neck. And in days or weeks, like his “aunt” Kanimozhi, he is likely to enjoy the hospitality of Tihar Jail in Delhi, courtesy the CBI. Whether his elder brother and Sun TV’s top honcho, Kalanidhi Maran will keep him company, we’ll have to wait and see. For the misdemeanour under inquiry has been jointly perpetrated by them. The fact that Dayanidhi was a Union Minister at that time, and had blatantly misused that position for business gains, makes things slightly more difficult for him to wriggle out.

The first stone against the younger of the Maran brothers was cast late last night (January 21st, 2015) when S Kannan, Chief Technical Officer in elder brother Kalanidhi’s Sun TV, K S Ravi, an electrician and V Gowthaman, the Additional Private Secretary to Dayanidhi during his Union Telecom Minister tenure, were picked up in Chennai. The CBI said the three had been arrested to collect crucial evidence which may come up during their custodial interrogation.

If the CBI is really keen to get at the truth (and there is no reason at this juncture to suspect otherwise), they are sure to employ a variety of tactics on the trio, which will make them sing. And if they sing, it’s going to be the hot seat for the brothers Maran.

The evidence hoped to be collected relates to the year 2006-2007, when Dayanidhi is reported to have used his position as Union Telecom Minister to set up a 323-lines mini telephone exchange in his house on the posh Boat Club Road in Central Chennai, to transfer data for and on behalf of his elder brother Kalanidhi’s satellite TV network. According to a secret report prepared by the CBI as early as in September, 2007, the quantum of data transmitted through this illicit link was so huge that it had caused a loss to the nation of a whopping Rs 440 crores.


Of the 323  ISDN lines, which are used for mass transfer of data, voice and video, 23 lines were provided with Basic Rate Access facilities, which would facilitate communicating one socket to three channels. This can be used for transmission of signalling information. According to the CBI report, 48,72,027 units of calls had emanated from one telephone number --  24371515 --  in the month of March, 2007 alone.

Extrapolating this to 323 lines for a 4 month period when the lines were operative – we have an astounding consumption of 630 crore call units. At a rate of 0.70 rupee per call, this works out to a staggering Rs 440 crores.

Though this is peanuts when compared to the Rs 1,76,000 Crores loss caused by Dayanidhi’s successor in the Telecom Ministry, Andimuthu Raja, the audacity with which it was executed and the sheer arrogance of power that motivated it makes it the equivalent of an economic rape of the nation! Dayanidhi’s audacity at that time was such that he could threaten a Ratan Tata to part with a third of Tata DTH shares. He could also threaten the powerful head of the Tata empire not to reveal that he had threatened him! Further, he could strangulate street-fighter entrepreneur C Sivasankaran to sell Aircel, a telecom company promoted by him, to a Malaysia-based industrialist T Anandakrishnan, who in turn was coerced into gifting brother Kalanidhi with a Rs 800 crores DTH platform as an obvious quid-pro-quo!

With Dayanidhi’s grand uncle M Karunanidhi then presiding over Tamilnadu as Chief Minister and virtually dictating terms to a lame-duck UPA Government at the Centre headed by Manmohan Singh, Maran’s misdemeanours were kept under the wraps. Only when relations between the Congress and the DMK began to sour did the CBI muster the courage to commence a preliminary inquiry. A report was filed in 2011. Since then, with frequent prodding from the Supreme Court, the case has inched slowly forward.

The findings as of date indicate that Kalanidhi’s Sun TV had used the illegal telephone exchange to transmit news-related footages, video files and data to various countries and vice versa at the tax payers account. In the process, the TV network is reported to have saved as much as Rs 1300 crores.

But a closer look will indicate that this argument is flawed. The total turnover of the Sun TV group for 2006-07 was Rs 678 crores. When this was so, surely, Rs 1,300 crores cannot be a presumptive expenditure (or potential saving) under a single head namely, data transmission. Something is seriously amiss.
Sources within the BSNL confess that no information was available with them about the numbers assigned to the Dayanidhi Maran exchange. The details were neither with the computer cell nor with Public Grievances cell. The implication is that these 323 numbers had been kept out of the exchange system itself and hence was not known even to the telephone department.

But pray why?

Obviously, the idea was not only to deny the existence of the lines, when push came to shove, but to suppress its existence to everyone including the telephone department. These lines obviously could not have been used by Sun TV to send their programs and data. The mathematics simply does not add up. Surely such subterfuge gives clue to a different dimension altogether.
The arrest of three persons in connection with the illegal telephone exchange and transfer of data case is the first step. What has come out into the public domain is only the tip of the proverbial iceberg. A lot more skeletons will tumble out. It will be interesting to see what the CBI manages to unearth.

Meanwhile, here are some credible speculations based on my own long years in the media:

I have been part of the media industry for over three decades. Of this almost two decades have been in the electronic media. A decade and a half of this has been as the head of the News wing of a prominent Tamil satellite TV network. And I know, for a fact, that there is very little possibility or necessity for transferring data to or from a TV channel to any destination in the world to the tune of Rs 440 crores over four months. Then what could be the nature of data said to have been transmitted by the Maran brothers?

Could the telephone exchange have been used for some other more sinister purposes than made out? Was something bigger and better getting transmitted through these telephone lines?

Could the Marans have been using this exchange for eavesdropping on some of India's most powerful and influential? After all, in today’s world, knowledge is power.

Is that why the CBI was reluctant to act despite being in the know for the past five years? Is that why the then Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh was hesitant to act on this matter?

Before anyone dismisses this as a figment of my imagination, let us not forget that in this day of advanced communication technology, eavesdropping is easy, especially if one has a telephone exchange at one’s own residence connected to 323 ISDN lines. Again who can ignore the allegation levelled by the Central Board of Direct Taxation that the offices of the then Finance Minister, Pranab Mukherjee were monitored through spying devices, which had been pasted in as many as 11 places in his room using adhesives and later been pulled out. The Intelligence Bureau which looked into this allegation at the behest of the Prime Minister, covered up with the unconvincing claim that what was found in the Finance Minister’s was not planted adhesives but chewing gum!
Surely my speculations are no more far-fetched than this.

Can someone come up with a better explanation? 

Wednesday 1 April 2015

WAS JESUS CHRIST CRUCIFIED ON GOOD FRIDAY?

I have always had a penchant for courting controversy. We are made for each other. In fact, what Amitabh Bachchan once said about controversies dogging him, applies to me as well : "I just lead my life as naturally, as normally as I possibly can. But I can't help it if controversy is hounding me day in and day out. I'm quite amazed sometimes by the way they go about it. I grow a beard and it lands up in the editorial in The Times of India."


It is with these thoughts in mind that I reproduce in this blog the contents of a mail I received on the eve of Good Friday. It provides food for thought. It is highly illuminating. It is rational. And, I dare say, as close to the truth as possible when talking about an incident that took place 2000 years ago. I publish it at the risk of being labelled a crackpot and a non-conformist. But that does not stop me from standing up... and speaking out.


Was Jesus crucified on Good Thursday or Good Friday?


While Church tradition commemorates the crucifixion of Jesus on Good Friday, there are many debates over which day of the week Jesus died. Did Jesus really die on a Friday? Or did he die on a Wednesday or Thursday?



Jesus had prophesied that he would be dead for three days and three nights before his resurrection (Matthew 12:38-40) : When Pharisees asked Jesus for a sign to prove He was the Messiah, Jesus says plainly, "An evil and adulterous generation seeketh after a sign; and there shall no sign be given to it, but the sign of the prophet Jonah: For as Jonah was three days and three nights in the whale's belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth".

There are obviously not three days and three nights between Friday evening and Sunday before dawn. If Friday is accepted as the day of crucifixion, then the only sign Jesus gave that He was the prophesied Messiah was not fulfilled and the claim of His messiahship rests on the fulfillment of His words -- it's that serious a matter!!

The Friday view is based on the wording of Mark 15:42, which says that Christ's crucifixion occurred on the 'Day of preparation', "the day before the Sabbath". Since the Hebrew weekly Sabbath is on Saturday, the Church traditionally held that Jesus was crucified on Friday.

This problem appears easily resolved by a clarification of what Mark meant by "Sabbath". Along with the weekly Saturday Sabbath day, the Jews had other "Sabbaths" throughout the year, marking high holy days. Two in particular belongs to the Feast of Unleavened bread following the Passover. It is vitally important to understand these Sabbaths, if we have to determine the day of Crucifixion.

Passover is the holy and joyous festival that commemorates Israel’s deliverance from bondage in Egypt. The Jews cried out to God in their oppression, and God sent Moses to deliver them. But Pharaoh refused to let the Israelite go, so God told Moses He would strike every Egyptian home with the death of the firstborn, both man and beast. The Jews were instructed to slay a lamb and "take some of the blood and put it on the sides and tops of the door frames of the houses". Then God promised, "on that night when I see the blood, I will pass over you". The death of the firstborn of Egyptian household finally breaks Pharaoh's resistance and he finally let the Israelites go. All details in Exodus 12.

Hence the term "Passover" and this was to be a lasting sacred memorial with God.

Leviticus 23:5 designates: The 14th day of the first month (Nisan) to be the day for observing Passover.

And the following day "the 15th day Nisan" is the beginning of "The feast of unleavened bread". This feast lasts for seven days from 15th day to 21st day and only unleavened bread was to be eaten during these seven days immediately following the Passover. Yet both the 15th and 21st of Nisan ( 1st and 7th day ) were set apart as holy days, "Special Sabbaths" also known as HIGH DAYS - on which no work was to be done. These are different to the normal weekly Saturday Sabbaths on the seventh day of each week. Preparations for the Passover feast took place on the 14th day of Nissan commonly known as the ‘Day of Preparation’, referred to by all four Gospels (Matthew 27:62, Mark 15:42, Luke 23:54, John19:14, 31, 42).“ And on that day before twilight, the Passover lamb was sacrificed at the temple in Jerusalem. After sunset, when Preparation Day had ended and the Feast of Unleavened Bread had begun, (15th day) the lamb and other specific foods for the Pesach feast were eaten.

Back to the crucifixion day, from Genesis (Chapter 2) we know that the Sabbath is the seventh day, the last day of the week. If, therefore, the regular Jewish Sabbath was the day after Jesus died, His crucifixion must have happened on a Friday, hence, ‘Good Friday’. Every Gentile in the church would have known that the Jewish Sabbath was a Saturday. So few would have questioned whether Jesus died on a Friday.

John was aware of the confusion that could have, or already had, arisen in the minds of Gentile readers of earlier Gospels, unfamiliar with Jewish customs. Therefore in his own account of the crucifixion and burial, he quotes Mark's words that “it was the day of preparation” (19:31), but then emphasises that the Sabbath that followed “was a high day” (literally, “for the day of that Sabbath was great”).That is, it wasn't just the routine weekly Sabbath. This was a special Sabbath coming up, and the day before it, on which Jesus was crucified, was that day known as “the day of preparation” (19:42).

"The Jews therefore, because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the Sabbath day, (for that Sabbath day was a high day,) besought Pilate that their legs might be broken, and that they might be taken away". John 19:31 KJV

This conclusively proves that the Sabbath mentioned here and in the other narratives was the first Holy Day of the biblical Feast of Unleavened Bread, the 15th day of Nisan (Leviticus:23:4-8) and not the weekly Saturday Sabbath.

Hence the ‘special High Day Sabbath’ the 15th of Nisan (Friday) being followed by a normal Weekly Sabbath on the 16th, (Saturdaywill lead to a crucifixion on Thursday afternoon- the 14th day of Nisan, the preparation day. Clearly an extra day and night added and will have the prophesied three days and three nights complete. If we allow the Scriptures to interpret themselves, an accurate harmonization of all four Gospel accounts demonstrates the accuracy and validity of Jesus' statements.

And so conclusively JESUS WAS CRUCIFIED ON GOOD THURSDAY AND NOT GOOD FRIDAY.

-QED-